Better Late Than Never (or the Transparency Train Derailed)

April 16, 2009

I just couldn’t pick a title.

“Better late than never” because the Sun finally got its butt in gear and reported on the Hopkinton ticket quota.  ”The Transparency Train derailed” because Felkner is full of  proverbial “no comments” for this story; which is funny because he can’t shut his mouth when it comes to the School Board.  Perhaps he is educable!  Has he learned how not to say the first thing that comes into his head?  Or perhaps he is just angling for a bigger political career and doesn’t want to ruin it by saying something stupid?  Again.

Anyway, the point of the Sun’s article is that the Town Council insists that they did not request the policy, it is the Police Department’s business and the Council knew nothing about it.  I happen to believe their excuse.  I suspect that the Manager did have something to do with it, after all, he is the Chief’s boss, but the Town Council doesn’t have a freaking clue about what is going on in Town, nor do they care, so they are automatically off the hook.

Some delightful quotes from the article:

DiLibero, who is out of town for the week, told The Sun Monday on his cell phone, “I just don’t want to comment on it any further.”

Bad time to go on vacation, eh Billy?  Don’t worry, the cops are actually all over the place all the sudden so I suspect this will fester for a few more months.

Councilor Beverly P. Kenney said that, prior to learning of the leaked policy, “I believe the police department was doing their job.”  She also declined to elaborate on the matter, saying, “I have not had a chance to investigate it.” She said she plans to speak with DiLibero first as “that’s the chain of command for us.”

Excellent.  I am ever so comforted when Delores Umbridge speaks.  Call out the High Inquisitors!

Capalbo declined to say what she thought of the policy because of conflicting statements from Baruti and Police Chief John S. Scuncio reported in the Journal story on why it was implemented.

I’m sure she was thinking, “colossal stupidity”.  I know I am.

Thompson said she is confident the issue will be resolved internally by the department, saying — like Capalbo — it is a personnel matter to be dealt with administratively, not by the council. She said she does not plan to tell the police department what to do with the policy.

It is a good thing we didn’t elect these people to actually do anything!   The Town Council cannot interfere in an investigation, they can tell the Police Department to cut it out with the quota.  But that would require some  testicles, figuratively speaking.

Although Thompson noted she has yet to read the email on the policy, she said, “As a resident, I find it distasteful.”

I am glad someone does.

Scuncio and Baruti did not return repeated phone calls seeking comment. 

Smart move, their first one so far.

And life goes on.  Keep you eyes open, in the past 3 days I have seen more Hopkinton cops than I have seen in the past year.  They are diligently working on their quota and they are coming for you!

7 Responses to “Better Late Than Never (or the Transparency Train Derailed)”

  1. Embarrassment Says:

    ” this hopkinton town council should be ashamed. VOTE THEM OUT. “

  2. sick and tired Says:

    ” So much for transparency town. Do you really believe these town councilors had no idea about this. If they truly didn’t then they better start paying more attention to what is happening. Does anyone else think this town council and Town Manager just don’t have a clue as to what they are doing? It seems like this town has come to a halt over the past few years. Wake up, pay attention to your duties and run this town like you were elected to do. Maybe you should layoff these officers that are not doing what they are paid to do. Get some more business in here and maybe you wouldn’t have to worry about writing more tickets to bring in revenue. Talk about kangaroo court, I think this town council is a joke. Lets vote them all out next time and get some people in there that can make this a good place to live again. “

  3. iamishmael Says:

    I fully believe that Town Council had no idea what was going on. Since the hiring of our first Town Manager, subsequent Town Councils have abdicated their responsibility for decision making. They let the Manager run the Town and they show up twice a month to vote on stuff they haven’t even read.

    The whole point of the Manager position was to get the Council off the hook for having to do anything. I once had a former Councilor tell me, “The Town Manger is great. Citizens used to call me up at work and home constantly bothering me with their problems! Now they call him instead. It makes my life much easier”.

    This is the attitude of the Town Council. They don’t want to know and they don;t want to do anything. This Town has rapidly spiraled into the toilet ever since it approved the Charter. The Charter is a HUGE waste and so has everything to come out of it, despite the best intentions of the people who are in favor of it.

  4. Taxed out of home Says:

    ” How about checking the policy of Baruti’s “Flex” schedule? Work when he wants so he can also work his hours at his law office! Talk about a rip off working on the Town’s dime at the same time doing his private work as a lawyer. ” Plus you paid for his law school education per police contract !

  5. 123 redlight Says:

    Ya know. When the police have corrupt practices that’s when you’re in trouble. Am I the only one who is outraged by this quota stuff? And what about Pawtucket they use traffic fines to pay themselves overtime! for cripe sakes!
    Police depts all over the state should be prevented from profiting from fines. How the hell are you going to get professional equitable service otherwise?

    It’s legalized racketeering. Police depts used to be ashamed at any inference that they were levying fines to make money. Now they admit it and they are not even ashamed!

    AND DANGEROUS! Cut it out. Police officer does not even make it into the top 100 most dangerous jobs in the US. (High steel is the top one IIRC) And even if it were dangerous…THAT IS NO EXCUSE FOR RACKETEERING.

  6. boffthis Says:

    I posted a reply under the other article by the journal. I have had more time to think about this and have come to the conclusion there is a bunch of idiots operating the police dept.
    If the police department measures productivity by the amount of tickets its officers writes, then their really is no adults at the helm.
    There are so many more metrics that can be used by a department to measure productivity. But they would require work and thinking on the chain of commands level.
    How many crimes where not committed because officers where on patrol? Measure the number of phone calls against patrolmen’s shift and crime level. Just because officer Snuffy did not issued a ticket today, does not mean he was not effective. Check the logs, maybe he made contact with a bunch of kids and by talking to them, they decided to behave.
    Maybe officer Snuffy, stopped a car with a broken headlight, but did not write a ticket, but gave a verbal warning. In this case he was much more effective. He has built a rapport with the offender. Next time the offender needs help, or officer Snuffy asks him for help, he will know who to talk to. It is a form of community policing.
    Officers should be required to report all contacts, regardless if they are criminal or not. i.e., Stopped and talked with four juveniles outside of gas station. Answered some questions they had.
    or: Stopped car, plate number XXX-123 and gave warning about broken tail light.
    The mileage on the car should be reported for each police vehicle. If officer Snuffy drove 150 miles in his shift and did not make any contacts, he is screwing off. If officer snuffy drove 45 miles and make thirteen contacts, but wrote no tickets, he is doing his job.
    A job of the police force is to build trust. Crap like this idiots e-mail does just the opposite. A citizen should not be afraid of the police. Police are much more effective when the citizens look to them for help.
    Maybe the town charter should be changed. Elect a town Marshall to run the police department. Every four years. That way the citizens get a say about who runs their police force. Spell it out that he or she reports to the town council.

  7. crickets Says:

    no word from the council on this after this past meeting? obviously hiding is the answer. glad mr. transparency decided that once his case was resolved, there was nothing worth talking about on the council.


Leave a Reply